in the Interest of C.M.D., a Child
This text of in the Interest of C.M.D., a Child (in the Interest of C.M.D., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00496-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN THE INTEREST OF C.M.D., A CHILD
On appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes
This is an appeal of the trial court’s order dated August 25, 2020, terminating the
parental rights of S.G. (Mother) and R.D. (Father) to one minor child, C.M.D. On
September 23, 2020, Father submitted a pro se notice of appeal.
On September 23, 2020 and October 28, 2020, the Clerk of this Court notified
Father, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would
dismiss this appeal unless the $205.00 filing fee was paid within ten days from receipt of the letter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Father has not responded to either of the notices
from the Clerk or paid the $205.00 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b), 42.3(c).
On October 26, 2020, the Clerk of this Court sent another notice to Father,
instructing that this appeal was also subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within seven days from the receipt
of the letter, Father provided a reasonable explanation for his failure to timely file a brief,
and the appellee is not significantly injured by Father’s failure to timely file a brief. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). More than seven days have passed, and
Father has not filed a brief or otherwise responded to the Clerk’s notice.
An appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution or failure to
comply with a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified
time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). In light of the foregoing, and mindful of the expedited
deadlines and procedures that apply to parental termination appeals, see TEX. R. APP. P.
28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a), we conclude this appeal should be dismissed.
Accordingly, the appeal in cause number 13-20-00496-CV is hereby DISMISSED
for want of prosecution and failure to comply with a notice from the Court. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 5, 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
GREGORY T. PERKES Justice
Delivered and filed the 19th day of November, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of C.M.D., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-cmd-a-child-texapp-2020.