In the Interest of C.M.C. v.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of C.M.C. v.

890 S.W.2d 311, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1816, 1994 WL 652504

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1994·No. No. 65348·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the decision of the Juvenile Court of St. Louis County adopting the Juvenile Court Commissioner’s order finding that a four-year-old juvenile came within the provisions of § 211.031(1), RSMo Supp.1993, and awarding custody of the juvenile to father. We affirm. The judgment of the Juvenile Court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the decision of the Juvenile Court of St. Louis County adopting the Juvenile Court Commissioner’s order finding that a four-year-old juvenile came within the provisions of § 211.031(1), RSMo Supp.1993, and awarding custody of the juvenile to father. We affirm. The judgment of the Juvenile Court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of C.M.C. v., 890 S.W.2d 311, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1816, 1994 WL 652504 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

890 S.W.2d 311 (In the Interest of C.M.C. v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.