In the Interest of C.L.K.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of C.L.K.

516 S.W.3d 453, 2017 WL 1488132, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 336

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 25, 2017

DocketED 104544

StatusPublished

This text of 516 S.W.3d 453 (In the Interest of C.L.K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of C.L.K., 516 S.W.3d 453, 2017 WL 1488132, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 336 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

J.J.P. (“Father”) seeks a reversal of the trial court’s judgment terminating his pa[454]*454rental rights to his minor son, C.L.K. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

J.J.P. (“Father”) seeks a reversal of the trial court’s judgment terminating his pa[454]*454rental rights to his minor son, C.L.K. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

516 S.W.3d 453, 2017 WL 1488132, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-clk-moctapp-2017.