In the Interest of C.L.K.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of C.L.K.

279 S.W.3d 240, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 394, 2009 WL 764884

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 24, 2009·No. ED 92057·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

P.M. and B.M. appeal from the trial court’s termination of their parental rights. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. In re A.S.O., 52 S.W.3d 59, 63 (Mo.App. W.D. 2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

P.M. and B.M. appeal from the trial court’s termination of their parental rights. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. In re A.S.O., 52 S.W.3d 59, 63 (Mo.App. W.D. 2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

In the Interest of C.L.K., 279 S.W.3d 240, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 394, 2009 WL 764884 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

279 S.W.3d 240 (In the Interest of C.L.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related