in the Interest of C.K.T., T.M.T. and V.M.T., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 8, 2005
Docket07-05-00275-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of C.K.T., T.M.T. and V.M.T., Children (in the Interest of C.K.T., T.M.T. and V.M.T., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of C.K.T., T.M.T. and V.M.T., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

NO. 07-05-0275-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

DECEMBER 8, 2005

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF C.K.T., T.M.T., AND V.M.T. _________________________________

FROM THE 46TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILBARGER COUNTY;

NO. 23,501; HONORABLE TOM NEELY, JUDGE _______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Freddie L. Thrash, filed a notice of appeal from a final decree entered on

April 28, 2005. The appellate record was complete on filing of the reporter’s record

October 7, 2005. See TEX . R. APP . P. 34.1. By letter dated November 22, 2005, the clerk

of this court notified counsel for appellant that appellant’s brief was due November 7, 2005,

but had yet to be filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 38.6(a). The letter further advised appellant

that the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if the brief, or a

response reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief with a showing that appellee had not been injured by the delay, was not filed by December 2, 2005. No brief, motion for

extension or other response has been received.1

Accordingly, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to

comply with a directive of the court. See TEX . R. APP . P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), (c).

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

1 Appellant filed a Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal on November 4, 2005 but the Court was not able to act on the motion without the appropriate fee being paid. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207(c)(4).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of C.K.T., T.M.T. and V.M.T., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ckt-tmt-and-vmt-children-texapp-2005.