in the Interest of C.H., C.H. and C.H., Minor Children
This text of in the Interest of C.H., C.H. and C.H., Minor Children (in the Interest of C.H., C.H. and C.H., Minor Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-04-0428-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
OCTOBER 25, 2004
______________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF C.H., C.H. AND C.H., CHILDREN
_________________________________
FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2002-518,450; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Deanna McCann filed a pro se notice of appeal on August 17, 2004. The
clerk’s record was filed on September 24, 2004, but no reporter’s record has been
received.1 The court reporter filed a request for extension of time to file the record and
informed this court that as of October 15, 2004, appellant has not paid or made
arrangements to pay for the record.
1 The bill of costs included in the clerk’s record indicates that appellant has not paid the cost of preparing the clerk’s record. On September 17, 2004, appellant was directed by letter to certify to the clerk of this
court, by September 27, 2004, in writing, whether Rules 34.5(10), 34.6(b)(1), and
35.3(a)(2), (b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure had been complied with; if so,
the date of the compliance, and if not, a reasonable explanation for non-compliance. She
was informed that failure to comply with the court’s directive might result in dismissal. After
appellant failed to respond, a second letter was sent on September 30, 2004, informing
appellant that failure to comply by October 11, 2004, would result in dismissal of the
appeal.
On October 12, 2004, this court received appellant’s response, but the response
does not include the information appellant was directed to provide. Because appellant has
failed to provide proof that she has paid for the reporter’s record or made satisfactory
arrangements for the payment of the record as directed by the court, we dismiss the
appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b) and 42.3(c).
Per Curiam
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of C.H., C.H. and C.H., Minor Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ch-ch-and-ch-minor-children-texapp-2004.