in the Interest of C.H., C.H. and C.H., Minor Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 25, 2004
Docket07-04-00428-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of C.H., C.H. and C.H., Minor Children (in the Interest of C.H., C.H. and C.H., Minor Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of C.H., C.H. and C.H., Minor Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

NO. 07-04-0428-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 25, 2004

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF C.H., C.H. AND C.H., CHILDREN

_________________________________

FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2002-518,450; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Deanna McCann filed a pro se notice of appeal on August 17, 2004. The

clerk’s record was filed on September 24, 2004, but no reporter’s record has been

received.1 The court reporter filed a request for extension of time to file the record and

informed this court that as of October 15, 2004, appellant has not paid or made

arrangements to pay for the record.

1 The bill of costs included in the clerk’s record indicates that appellant has not paid the cost of preparing the clerk’s record. On September 17, 2004, appellant was directed by letter to certify to the clerk of this

court, by September 27, 2004, in writing, whether Rules 34.5(10), 34.6(b)(1), and

35.3(a)(2), (b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure had been complied with; if so,

the date of the compliance, and if not, a reasonable explanation for non-compliance. She

was informed that failure to comply with the court’s directive might result in dismissal. After

appellant failed to respond, a second letter was sent on September 30, 2004, informing

appellant that failure to comply by October 11, 2004, would result in dismissal of the

appeal.

On October 12, 2004, this court received appellant’s response, but the response

does not include the information appellant was directed to provide. Because appellant has

failed to provide proof that she has paid for the reporter’s record or made satisfactory

arrangements for the payment of the record as directed by the court, we dismiss the

appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b) and 42.3(c).

Per Curiam

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of C.H., C.H. and C.H., Minor Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ch-ch-and-ch-minor-children-texapp-2004.