In the Interest of C.C.A., a Child v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 2023
Docket10-23-00325-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In the Interest of C.C.A., a Child v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of C.C.A., a Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of C.C.A., a Child v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00325-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.C.A., A CHILD

From the County Court at Law Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. CCL-22-53958

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s order in a suit affecting the parent-child

relationship, signed on September 18, 2023. Because the trial court has granted

Appellant’s motion for new trial, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

We have jurisdiction to hear an appeal only from a final judgment or from an

interlocutory order made immediately appealable by statute. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.

CODE ANN. § 51.012; Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352–53 (Tex. 1998) (per curiam).

Granting a new trial has the legal effect of vacating the original judgment and returning

the case to the trial docket as though there had been no previous trial or hearing.

Markowitz v. Markowitz, 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet.

denied). Thus, an order granting a new trial deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction over an appeal. In re O.C., No. 07-23-00136-CV, 2023 WL 3819195, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Amarillo June 5, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam).

By letter dated November 16, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that

this appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared that there was no final judgment.

The Clerk of the Court notified the parties that the Court may dismiss this appeal unless,

within fourteen days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for

continuing the appeal.

No response has been received. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

MATT JOHNSON Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed December 21, 2023 [CV06]

In the Interest of C.C.A., a Child Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Markowitz v. Markowitz
118 S.W.3d 82 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Stary v. DeBord
967 S.W.2d 352 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Interest of C.C.A., a Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-cca-a-child-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.