in the Interest of C.B., a Child

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in the Interest of C.B., a Child. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 6217
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 2012·No. 07-12-00065-CV·Published

Opinion

NO. 07-12-00065-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

MARCH 27, 2012

IN THE INTEREST OF C.B., A CHILD

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 78,825-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS WOODBURN, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND

In this accelerated appeal, appellant B.W., appeals an order terminating her

parental rights to her minor child C.B. Her court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a

motion to withdraw from representation supported by an Anders1 brief. By her brief

counsel certifies that in her professional opinion the case presents “no arguable points

of error.” Based on our review of the record filed by appellant, we find an arguable

appellate issue exists as to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court’s

finding that B.W. violated Family Code § 161.001(1)(O). Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This court has held that appointed counsel may file an Anders brief in an appeal from an order terminating parental rights. See In re A.W.T., 61 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 2001, no pet.). 161.001(1)(O) (West Supp. 2011). The arguable issue includes, but is not necessarily

limited to, whether legally and factually sufficient evidence established that C.B. was

removed from B.W. under Chapter 262 of the Family Code for the abuse or neglect of

C.B.

We therefore grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. The case is abated and

remanded to the trial court for the appointment of new counsel. Newly-appointed

counsel shall prepare and file an appellant’s brief developing the arguable issue we

have identified as well as any other ground that might support reversal or modification of

the judgment. Newly-appointed counsel shall not limit review to the record now on file

with this court but may request supplementation to any extent deemed necessary.

The trial court shall notify this court in writing of the name, address, telephone

number, fax number, and state bar number of B.W.’s newly-appointed counsel within

ten days of the date of this order. Newly-appointed counsel shall file the appellate brief

for B.W. within twenty days of the date of appointment by the trial court.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of C.B., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in the Interest of C.B., a Child (in the Interest of C.B., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In the Interest of AWT
61 S.W.3d 87 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)