in the Interest of C.A.J. and K.T.J.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00233-CV ____________________
IN THE INTEREST OF C.A.J. AND K.T.J. ________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. C-214,028-C ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Brandon Lee Jacks, Appellant, filed a notice of appeal from a final order in a
suit affecting the parent-child relationship. Despite written notices from this Court
and an opportunity to cure, to date, Appellant has neither established indigence nor
paid the filing fee for the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1. In addition, no clerk’s
record has been filed, and the clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal
informed the Court that Appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.
See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). On July 16, 2018, we notified the parties that the appeal
would be dismissed unless the filing fee was paid or Appellant filed a motion which
1 states the facts relied upon to reasonably explain the need for additional time to file
the record. Appellant did not respond to the Court’s notices.
There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for
the appeal, and there being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the
clerk’s record, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.
37.3(b), 42.3.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice
Submitted on August 29, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of C.A.J. and K.T.J. (in the Interest of C.A.J. and K.T.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.