in the Interest of C.A-G. and M.R., Children

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 20, 2015·No. 05-15-00593-CV·Published

Opinion

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed October 20, 2015.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00593-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.R., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FA-14-0065

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Brown, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Justice Brown Mother appeals from the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her

daughter, M.R. Mother’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw along with an

Anders brief asserting the appeal is without merit and there are no arguable grounds for reversal.

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

The procedures set forth in Anders are applicable to an appeal from a trial court’s order

terminating parental rights. In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d 849, 850 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, pet.

denied). Mother’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in accordance with such procedures.

Counsel’s brief presents a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds for reversal. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; see In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d at 850.

Counsel certified that he notified Mother that he filed an Anders brief and informed her of her

right to review the record and to file a brief or other response. See In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d at 850. This Court also notified Mother that her attorney filed a brief in which he concluded her

appeal was without merit. We forwarded Mother a copy of that brief and notified her of her right

to review the appellate record and to file a pro se response. Mother did not request the record or

file a response.

We have independently reviewed the entire record and counsel’s brief. We agree this

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that could arguably support

the appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order terminating Mother’s parental rights to

M.R. and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

150593F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN RE M.R., a CHILD On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas No. 05-15-00593-CV Trial Court Cause No. FA-14-0065. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered this 20th day of October, 2015.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of C.A-G. and M.R., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in the Interest of C.A-G. and M.R., Children (in the Interest of C.A-G. and M.R., Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In the Interest of D.D.
279 S.W.3d 849 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)