in the Interest of C. L. H., a Minor Child
This text of in the Interest of C. L. H., a Minor Child (in the Interest of C. L. H., a Minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-09-00102-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF C.L.H., A MINOR CHILD
On Appeal from the 62nd Judicial District Court
Franklin County, Texas
Trial Court No. 10,454
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Billy Jack Holloway was delinquent in making child support payments on numerous occasions over a two-year period resulting in contempt rulings. On June 25, 2009, a hearing on a motion to revoke community supervision was conducted. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court confirmed child support arrearages in the amount of $5,539.76, ordered release of those arrearages to the date Holloway became totally and permanently disabled (thus releasing $2,347.56 in child support arrearages) and entered judgment for past due child support in the amount of $3,192.20. The court confirmed medical support arrearages in the amount of $660.82, ordered release of medical support arrearages to the date Holloway became totally and permanently disabled (thus releasing $326.46 in medical support arrearages) and entered judgment for past due medical support in the amount of $334.36. In addition, the court ordered termination of current medical support as of June 1, 2009, and awarded judgment to Courtney Deann Peckham (mother of C.L.H.) for social security disability benefits received by Holloway.
The Office of the Texas Attorney General contends that the trial court abused its discretion in (1) reducing child support and medical support arrearages, (2) terminating current medical support, and (3) failing to award statutory interest on the judgment for lump sum distribution arrearages.
We addressed each of these issues in detail in our opinion of this date styled In re J.S.H., cause number 06-09-00101-CV. For the reasons stated therein, we reverse that portion of the judgment which releases past due child and medical support and render judgment that confirms child and medical support arrearages in the amounts determined to exist on May 31, 2009. We affirm that portion of the judgment ordering Holloway to pay $755.99 to Peckham without additional statutory interest on this amount. We remand to the trial court for a determination of the appropriate amount of cash medical support to be included in the judgment.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: April 20, 2010
Date Decided: April 21, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of C. L. H., a Minor Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-c-l-h-a-minor-child-texapp-2010.