In the Interest of B.P.

538 So. 2d 73, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 349, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 368, 1989 WL 6251
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1989·No. No. 88-2003·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state does not dispute the appellant’s contention that the trial court, in this juvenile proceeding, was precluded from suspending a driver’s license beyond the defendant’s nineteenth birthday. Jurisdiction over the defendant as a juvenile ceases when he attains the age of nineteen. See C.L.D. v. Beauchamp, 464 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); State v. A.N.F., 413 So.2d 146 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); G.W.M. v. State, 391 So.2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

We find no error in that portion of the order requiring that the defendant perform one-thousand hours of community service at the rate of one-hundred hours per month.

The commitment order of the trial court is therefore reversed in part and remanded for modification in accordance with this opinion.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of B.P., 538 So. 2d 73, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 349, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 368, 1989 WL 6251 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

538 So. 2d 73 (In the Interest of B.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

V.I. v. State
667 So. 2d 439 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
DM v. State
580 So. 2d 634 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
R.M.S. v. State
552 So. 2d 301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Williams v. State
538 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)