in the Interest of B.N.M., K.A.M and B.J.M., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 9, 2011
Docket14-10-01138-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of B.N.M., K.A.M and B.J.M., Children (in the Interest of B.N.M., K.A.M and B.J.M., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of B.N.M., K.A.M and B.J.M., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 9, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-01138-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.N.M., K.A.M. and B.J.M., Children

On Appeal from the 313th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-07761J

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant M. C. appeals from a judgment signed October 29, 2010, terminating her parental rights to her three children.  The clerk’s record in the appeal has not been filed.  The Harris County District Clerk’s office informed this court that appellant paid a deposit of $150 for preparation of the record, but there is a balance due in the amount of $106.  The official court reporter for the 313th District Court also informed this court that appellant did not made arrangements to pay for preparation of the reporter’s record. 

On May 10, 2011, this court issued an order affirming the trial court’s ruling sustaining the contests to appellant’s affidavit of indigence.  See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737, 738-39 (Tex. 1998) (addressing the procedures to challenge an order sustaining a contest to an affidavit of indigence).  We ordered appellant to make payment arrangements for the complete record in this appeal and to provide this court with proof of these arrangements on or before May 31, 2011, or the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  To date, no response to our order has been filed. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Boyce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Arroyo
988 S.W.2d 737 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of B.N.M., K.A.M and B.J.M., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-bnm-kam-and-bjm-children-texapp-2011.