in the Interest of B.M.S., Child

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 15, 2015·No. 14-15-00864-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed October 15, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-15-00864-CV ____________

IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.S., CHILD, Appellant

On Appeal from the 314th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-04457J

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 9, 2015. The notice of appeal was due September 29, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on October 9, 2015, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of B.M.S., Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in the Interest of B.M.S., Child (in the Interest of B.M.S., Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Associates, Ltd.
974 S.W.2d 805 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)