In the Interest of B.J.

235 S.W.3d 604, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1440, 2007 WL 2993803
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2007·No. No. ED 89006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Cherylee Johnson, (“Johnson”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of Shelby County, the Honorable Hadley Grimm presiding, after the judge denied Johnson’s Motion to Intervene to determine the custody of Johnson’s granddaughter, B.J., finding that Johnson’s Motion to Intervene was against the best interest of B.J.

Johnson brings one claim of error, arguing that the trial court erred in denying Johnson’s Motion to Intervene because the Shelby County Juvenile Officer did not rebut the presumption that Johnson established a right to intervene under section 211.177 RSMo. (2000)1

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the brief submitted by Johnson2 and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of B.J., 235 S.W.3d 604, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1440, 2007 WL 2993803 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

235 S.W.3d 604 (In the Interest of B.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.