In the Interest of B.H.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of B.H.

461 S.W.3d 15, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 395, 2015 WL 1699245

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 2015·No. No. ED 101818·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

B.H. (Father) appeals the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to his children, B.H. and G.H. Father claims the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because the Children’s Division failed to use reasonable efforts to provide services to him.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in terminating the Father’s parental rights. An extended opinion would serve no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

B.H. (Father) appeals the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to his children, B.H. and G.H. Father claims the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because the Children’s Division failed to use reasonable efforts to provide services to him.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in terminating the Father’s parental rights. An extended opinion would serve no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of B.H., 461 S.W.3d 15, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 395, 2015 WL 1699245 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

461 S.W.3d 15 (In the Interest of B.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.