in the Interest of B.G.G., A/K/A A.G., and J.J.G., A/K/A J.G., Children v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
This text of in the Interest of B.G.G., A/K/A A.G., and J.J.G., A/K/A J.G., Children v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (in the Interest of B.G.G., A/K/A A.G., and J.J.G., A/K/A J.G., Children v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Denied and Order filed May 10, 2019
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-19-00278-CV ____________
In the Interest of B.G.G., a/k/a A.G., and J.J.G., a/k/a J.G., children
On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-60051
ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a parental termination appeal. The judgment was signed December 20, 2018, and the notice of appeal was filed December 26, 2018, but the notice of appeal was not forwarded to this court until April 2, 2019. The record was complete as of April 9, 2019.
Appellant, B.G. (Mother), is represented by appointed counsel, Bradley Tilton. Mother’s brief was due April 29, 2019. Because no brief was filed, on April 30, 2019, we issued an order directing Tilton to file Mother’s brief by May 10, 2019.
On May 9, 2019, Tilton filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file Mother’s brief. The motion states in relevant part: • Tilton was appointed on February 7, 2019 but did not learn of the appointment until April 2, 2019, when Mother’s trial counsel informed him;
• Tilton was busy on another matter and unable to turn to this case until the following week;
• Tilton did not receive notice that the record had been filed in this court;
• On April 18, 2019, Tilton filed a notice of appearance as counsel in this court;
• Also on April 18, 2019, unaware that the record had been filed, Tilton filed a motion in the trial court for a free copy of the record; and
• Tilton has still not been able to access the “case file” from the district clerk’s website.
The motion asks for a 30-day extension (until Sunday, June 9, 2019) to file the brief.
“[S]o far as reasonably possible,” appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). This accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. Even though we did not learn of this appeal until 98 days after the notice of appeal was filed—more than halfway through the 180-day period—we are still bound to bring this appeal to final disposition by the deadline of June 24, 2019. Tilton’s requested extension would leave just two weeks for the appellee, the Texas Department of Family & Protective Services (the Department), to file its brief and this court to issue its opinion.
Accordingly, we DENY the motion to extend time and issue the following order:
1. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record may be downloaded from our Attorney Record Portal. Instructions regarding the portal may be found on the court’s website. 2. Documents that are part of the record below but not yet part of the record on appeal may be included in the appendix to a party’s brief, with a notation that the official document has been requested for the district clerk. Further instructions are published on the court’s website.
3. Tilton shall file Mother’s brief no later than May 20, 2019. If the brief is not filed by that date, we will decide this appeal based on the record before this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(2). 4. The Department may file a brief in this case, regardless of whether an appellants’ brief is filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(3).
5. The court will not delay submission of the appeal or issuance of its opinion awaiting Mother’s brief or the Department’s brief.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of B.G.G., A/K/A A.G., and J.J.G., A/K/A J.G., Children v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-bgg-aka-ag-and-jjg-aka-jg-children-v-texapp-2019.