in the Interest of B.G., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 26, 2008
Docket04-08-00442-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of B.G., Children (in the Interest of B.G., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of B.G., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00442-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.G., J.G., B.G., S.M., and G.M.

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-PA-01011 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 26, 2008

AFFIRMED

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating Karen Long’s parental rights. The

trial court found Long to be indigent but concluded that her appellate points were frivolous. See

TEX . FAM . CODE ANN . § 263.405(d) (Vernon Supp. 2008). Long’s court-appointed appellate

attorney has also concluded that her appellate points are frivolous. Counsel has filed a motion to

withdraw and a brief in support of that motion, stating that, in his professional opinion, the appeal

is frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds for relief. See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from order terminating 04-08-00442-CV

parental rights). Counsel sent a copy of his brief to Long and advised her of her right to examine the

record and to file a pro se brief. Long, however, did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the

record, we agree that Long’s appeal is frivolous and without merit. Therefore, we affirm the trial

court’s judgment terminating Long’s parental rights and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Karen Angelini, Justice

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of B.G., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-bg-children-texapp-2008.