In the Interest of B.E.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of B.E.

121 S.W.3d 267, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1850

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2003·No. No. ED 82686·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brandi R. Thurman appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her daughter B.E., born January 2, 2001. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by substantial evidence. In re D.C., 49 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brandi R. Thurman appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her daughter B.E., born January 2, 2001. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by substantial evidence. In re D.C., 49 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

In the Interest of B.E., 121 S.W.3d 267, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1850 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

121 S.W.3d 267 (In the Interest of B.E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related