in the Interest of B.D, A.D, D.D., and D.D. v. Department of Family and Protective Services

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 30, 2011·No. 01-09-00369-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued November 30, 2011.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas


NO. 01-09-00369-CV

____________


IN THE INTEREST OF B.D., A.D, D.D., AND D.D.

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2007-62291


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellants Jacqueline Kennedy and Gina Davis have failed to timely file a brief.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a) (failure of appellant to file brief).  After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. 

We deny appellee’s motion for rehearing on the court’s order requiring the reporter’s record to be filed without cost to the appellants.  We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of B.D, A.D, D.D., and D.D. v. Department of Family and Protective Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in the Interest of B.D, A.D, D.D., and D.D. v. Department of Family and Protective Services (in the Interest of B.D, A.D, D.D., and D.D. v. Department of Family and Protective Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.