in the Interest of B.A.B.
This text of in the Interest of B.A.B. (in the Interest of B.A.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00556-CV ____________________
IN THE INTEREST OF B.A.B.
_______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 279th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F-211,882-B ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 23, 2014, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal had
not been timely filed, and informed the appellant that she could request an
extension of time to file the notice of appeal. On January 8, 2015, we notified the
parties that the appellant had not established indigence and warned that the appeal
would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for
filing the clerk’s record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed
to file the record. On January 12, 2015, we notified the parties that the appeal
would be dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal.
Appellant did not respond to this Court’s notices.
An appellant who wishes to proceed on appeal without payment of costs
must file an affidavit of indigence. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. An appeal may be
dismissed for want of prosecution if the appellant is not entitled to appeal without
payment of costs and fails to pay for the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P.
37.3(b). An appeal may be dismissed if the appellant fails to comply with a
requirement of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure or fails to respond to a
notice from the clerk of the Court requiring a response of other action within a
specified time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and has not shown
that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See generally Tex. R. App.
P. 20.1. Appellant failed to comply with notices that required a response. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3(c). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R.
App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice
Submitted on February 18, 2015 Opinion Delivered February 19, 2015
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of B.A.B., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-bab-texapp-2015.