In the Interest of B. W. S.

458 S.E.2d 847, 265 Ga. 567, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 2317, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 521
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 14, 1995
DocketS95A0659
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 458 S.E.2d 847 (In the Interest of B. W. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of B. W. S., 458 S.E.2d 847, 265 Ga. 567, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 2317, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 521 (Ga. 1995).

Opinion

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

A complaint against B. W. S. was filed in juvenile court, alleging that B. W. S. committed the offenses of murder, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime and possession of a firearm by an underage person. The juvenile court ordered the case transferred to superior court. B. W. S. contends the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction to transfer the case because the original hearing on the delinquency petition was set several days before the filing of the petition. We affirm because the juvenile court obtained jurisdiction with the filing of the complaint.

1. On December 10, 1993 a complaint was filed against B. W. S. in juvenile court alleging he committed murder.1 The juvenile court held a detention hearing on that day, notified B. W. S. of a possible bind-over to superior court, and scheduled the adjudicatory hearing for December 15, 1993. On December 13, 1993 the delinquency petition was filed. The parties agreed to continue the December 15 hearing and the court issued an order setting the hearing for January 14, 1994. After the juvenile court ordered B. W. S. transferred to superior court, B. W. S. moved to dismiss, contending that the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction to order the transfer because the court set the date for the transfer hearing before the delinquency petition was filed.2

In In the Interest of C. R.,3 this Court held that a juvenile court acquires jurisdiction with the filing of a complaint against the juvenile. Thus, jurisdiction vested in the juvenile court on December 10, 1993, when the complaint was filed and the juvenile court did not err [568]*568in denying B. W. S.’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Additionally, we find no abuse in the judge’s discretion in continuing the hearing until January 14, 1994. In this case, the court continued the hearing from December 15 without objection because reports were incomplete.

Decided July 14, 1995. Suparna Malempati, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Carole E. Wall, Leonora Grant, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

2. We find no merit in B. W. S.’s remaining enumerations.4

Judgment affirmed.

Benham, C. J., Sears, Hunstein, Carley and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of N. C.
667 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
In Re NC
667 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Flowers v. State
461 S.E.2d 533 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 S.E.2d 847, 265 Ga. 567, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 2317, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-b-w-s-ga-1995.