In the Interest Of: B. E. Q. T., a Child (Father)

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 22, 2015
DocketA15D0400
StatusPublished

This text of In the Interest Of: B. E. Q. T., a Child (Father) (In the Interest Of: B. E. Q. T., a Child (Father)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest Of: B. E. Q. T., a Child (Father), (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 03, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0400. IN THE INTEREST OF: B. E. Q. T., A CHILD (FATHER).

On January 27, 2015, the juvenile court entered an order terminating the parental rights of the father of B. E. Q. T. Ninety-eight days later, on May 5, 2015, the father filed an application for discretionary appeal. An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The filing deadline is jurisdictional, and this Court is unable to accept an untimely application. See Crosson v. Conway, 291 Ga. 220 (1) (728 SE2d 617) (2012). Although the juvenile court purported to grant the father an extension of time to file an application, it lacked authority to do so. Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 85 (2) (a) (720 SE2d 170) (2011) (“Because a discretionary application must be filed only in an appellate court, see OCGA § 5-6-35 (d), a trial court may not grant an extension of the time to file the application pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-39.”) (Emphasis supplied). Instead, an applicant must request an extension from this Court, within the original 30-day filing period. Id.; see also Court of Appeals Rule 31 (g). Because the father did not make a timely request for an extension before this Court, we have no basis for excusing his failure to comply with the 30-day deadline set forth in OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 06/03/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gable v. State
720 S.E.2d 170 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2011)
Crosson v. Conway
728 S.E.2d 617 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Interest Of: B. E. Q. T., a Child (Father), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-b-e-q-t-a-child-father-gactapp-2015.