in the Interest of B. D. S. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of B. D. S. v. State

DecidedDecember 18, 2014

Docket01-14-00762-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of B. D. S. v. State (in the Interest of B. D. S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of B. D. S. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00762-CV Style: In the Matter of B.D.S. Date motion filed*: December 16, 2014 Type of motion: Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Reporter’s Record Party filing motion: Court reporter Document to be filed: Reporter’s Record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 13, 2014 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due date: December 15, 2014 Date Requested: January 15, 2015

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: January 15, 2015  No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Because the reporter stated that she has been busy with a large capital murder record in our court, her third motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record is granted until January 15, 2015, but no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley  Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: December 18, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00762-CV Style: In the Matter of B.D.S. Date motion filed*: December 16, 2014 Type of motion: Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Reporter’s Record Party filing motion: Court reporter Document to be filed: Reporter’s Record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 13, 2014 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due date: December 15, 2014 Date Requested: January 15, 2015

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: January 15, 2015  No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Because the reporter stated that she has been busy with a large capital murder record in our court, her third motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record is granted until January 15, 2015, but no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley  Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: December 18, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of B. D. S. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-b-d-s-v-state-texapp-2014.