in the Interest of Ashley Jordan Exparza and Kristen Nicole Exparza, Children
This text of in the Interest of Ashley Jordan Exparza and Kristen Nicole Exparza, Children (in the Interest of Ashley Jordan Exparza and Kristen Nicole Exparza, Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-02-0270-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL E
NOVEMBER 27, 2002
______________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY JORDAN EXPARZA AND KRISTEN NICOLE EXPARZA, CHILDREN _________________________________
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 98-500,780-A; HONORABLE DRUE FARMER, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1
On June 26, 2002, the clerk of this court received a copy of Notice of Appeal filed
on behalf of appellant Stephen Exparza. By letter dated June 27, 2002, the clerk advised
counsel for appellant that a filing fee had not been received, see TEX . R. APP. P. 5, nor had
a docketing statement been filed. See TEX . R. APP. P. 32.1. The clerk’s letter likewise
advised that no further action would be taken on the appeal by this Court until a filing fee
had been paid and that failure to pay the filing fee may result in dismissal of the appeal.
See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3. Subsequently, the clerk has received and granted motions for
extension of time to file the trial court clerk’s record and the reporter’s record because
1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. appellant had not designated matters to be included in the records and had not paid for or
made arrangements to pay for the records.
The filing fee was not paid. By letter dated September 18, 2002, the appellate clerk
advised counsel for appellant that (1) the filing fee had still not been paid, (2) notice had
been received that the trial records had not been paid for and that no arrangements had
been made to pay for the records and (3) unless the filing fee was received on or before
October 1, 2002, and proof that the trial records had been paid for or arrangements made
to pay for the records by that date, the appeal would be subject to dismissal.
The filing fee has not been paid. Proof of payment for, or arrangements for
payment for, the trial records has not been received. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3.
Phil Johnson Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of Ashley Jordan Exparza and Kristen Nicole Exparza, Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ashley-jordan-exparza-and-krist-texapp-2002.