in the Interest of Ashley Brook Watts, a Child
This text of in the Interest of Ashley Brook Watts, a Child (in the Interest of Ashley Brook Watts, a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and JOHNSON, JJ.
On January 28, 2002, the appellant filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal moving this court to withdraw appellant's Notice of Appeal and dismiss the appeal.
Without passing on the merits of the case, the appellant's Motion to Dismiss Appeal is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). All costs are assessed against the party incurring the same.
Phil Johnson
Justice
Do not publish.
ithout prejudice to the refiling of a second motion.
Counsel for real party in interest in the underlying action, entitled Lilith Brainard, Sally Brainard Wicker, E. Swasey F. Brainard, II, Amy Brainard, Berklee Brainard Clements, Sena Brainard, and the Estate of Edward H. Brainard, II, v. Premier Well Service, Inc., cause number 31,677, 31st Judicial District Court, Gray County, is requested to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to Rule 52.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on or before October 1, 2001.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of Ashley Brook Watts, a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ashley-brook-watts-a-child-texapp-2002.