in the Interest of A.R.,H.R., and D.R.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00563-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.R., H.R., and D.R., Children
From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-PA-02447 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 20, 2013
AFFIRMED
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order terminating Appellants’ parental rights to
their three children. The court-appointed appellate attorney for each appellant filed a brief
containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced. Each attorney concludes that the appeal for his respective client is
frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San
Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in an appeal from a termination of
parental rights) (mem. op.); see also In re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774, 775 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth
2003, order) (same). 04-12-00563-CV
The attorney for each appellant certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to his
respective client who was advised of his or her right to examine the record and to file a pro se
brief. Neither parent filed a pro se brief. After reviewing the record, we agree that each
Appellant’s appeal is frivolous and without merit. We affirm the trial court’s order and grant
each Appellant’s attorney’s motion to withdraw.
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of A.R.,H.R., and D.R. (in the Interest of A.R.,H.R., and D.R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.