In the Interest of A.R.F.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of A.R.F.

340 S.W.3d 605, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 503

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 12, 2011·No. No. ED 95454·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Patty Johnston and Richard Fearn appeal the judgment of the trial court terminating their parental rights. The judg[606] ment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Patty Johnston and Richard Fearn appeal the judgment of the trial court terminating their parental rights. The judg[606] ment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of A.R.F., 340 S.W.3d 605, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 503 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

340 S.W.3d 605 (In the Interest of A.R.F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.