In the Interest of A.R.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of A.R.

383 S.W.3d 68, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2012 WL 5207620

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 2012·No. No. ED 97887·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremiah S. (“Father”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to A.S.R., E.R., A.C.R., C.R., N.R., P.R., and RR. (collectively “Children”).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremiah S. (“Father”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to A.S.R., E.R., A.C.R., C.R., N.R., P.R., and RR. (collectively “Children”).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of A.R., 383 S.W.3d 68, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2012 WL 5207620 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

383 S.W.3d 68 (In the Interest of A.R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.