in the Interest of A.R., A.B.r, A.L.A., A.L.A., A.J.R., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 19, 2012
Docket13-12-00340-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of A.R., A.B.r, A.L.A., A.L.A., A.J.R., Children (in the Interest of A.R., A.B.r, A.L.A., A.L.A., A.J.R., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of A.R., A.B.r, A.L.A., A.L.A., A.J.R., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-000340-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R., A.B.R., A.L.A., A.L.A., A.J.R., CHILDREN ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, S.R. 1 , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 430th

District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CW-034-11-J. On June 26,

2012, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause

was originally due on May 29, 2012, and that the deputy district clerk, Aida Villarreal, had

1 In appeals from cases involving the termination of parental rights, the rules of appellate procedure require the use of an alias to refer to a minor, Aand if necessary to protect the minor=s identity, to the minor=s parent or other family member.” Tex. R. App. P. 9.8. notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's

record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be

taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).

Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date

of receipt of this Court’s notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 19th day of July, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of A.R., A.B.r, A.L.A., A.L.A., A.J.R., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ar-abr-ala-ala-ajr-children-texapp-2012.