in the Interest of A.P.A., P.M.A. and L.M.A.
This text of in the Interest of A.P.A., P.M.A. and L.M.A. (in the Interest of A.P.A., P.M.A. and L.M.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00175-CV ____________________
IN THE INTEREST OF A.P.A., P.M.A. AND L.M.A.
________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. PC06277 ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The trial court signed a final order in a suit to modify parent-child relationship
on March 22, 2018. Balie Marie Humble, appellant, filed a notice of appeal but failed
to file a brief. On October 8, 2018, we notified the parties that appellant’s brief was
past due and had not been filed, that the appeal would be submitted on the record
alone unless we received a brief and motion for extension of time by October 18,
2018, and we warned appellant that her failure to file a brief could result in dismissal
of the appeal for want of prosecution. On October 22, 2018, having received no
response to the late brief notice, we notified the parties that the appeal would be 1 submitted to the Court on November 13, 2018, without briefs and without oral
argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8.
If an appellant fails to timely file a brief, the appellate court may dismiss the
appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure
and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a
brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). In this case, Appellant failed to assign error for
appellate review by filing a brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice
Submitted on November 13, 2018 Opinion Delivered November 15, 2018
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of A.P.A., P.M.A. and L.M.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-apa-pma-and-lma-texapp-2018.