In the Interest of A.P.

908 A.2d 284
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In the Interest of A.P.. Read the opinion of the Court — 589 Pa. 281
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 24, 2006·No. Appeal No. 5 WAP 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2006, the Order of the Superior Court is REVERSED, appellant’s appeal is REINSTATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration on the merits. The Superior Court panel erred in raising the issue of appellant’s standing to appeal sua sponte, and then quashing the appeal upon that ground. See, e.g., In re Nomination Petition of deYoung, 903 A.2d 1164 (2006) (a court is prohibited from raising the issue of standing sua sponte). Furthermore, we note that the Commonwealth agreed with appellant that he has standing to appeal in this case. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of A.P., 908 A.2d 284 (Pa. 2006).

908 A.2d 284 (In the Interest of A.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In RE NOMINATION OF deYOUNG
903 A.2d 1164 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)