in the Interest of A.P., Children
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
July 11, 2016
No. 04-16-00259-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.P., ET AL., CHILDREN,
From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-PA-01950 Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding
ORDER
On June 15, 2016, we abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to determine (1) whether appellant Brittany B.’s counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and, if so, (2) whether appellant Brittany B. is indigent. The trial court has signed an order granting the motion withdraw, finding appellant Brittany B. is not indigent and that she “is not entitled to appointed counsel and will not be appointed counsel for appellate purposes.” We therefore order that this appeal be reinstated on the active docket of the court.
We further order appellant Brittany B. to file her appellant’s brief and Christopher B. to file his appellant’s brief by August 1, 2016. “In an appeal of a suit for termination of the parentchild relationship . . . appellate courts should, so far as reasonably possible, ensure that the appeal is brought to final disposition . . . [w]ithin 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed.” TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). Therefore, motions for extension of time to file briefs will be disfavored.
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of July, 2016.
Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of A.P., Children (in the Interest of A.P., Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.