in the Interest of Anastasia Nicole James-Sissamis and Christina Michelle James-Sissamis, Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2000
Docket13-00-00491-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of Anastasia Nicole James-Sissamis and Christina Michelle James-Sissamis, Children (in the Interest of Anastasia Nicole James-Sissamis and Christina Michelle James-Sissamis, Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of Anastasia Nicole James-Sissamis and Christina Michelle James-Sissamis, Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-00-491-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF ANASTASIA NICOLE JAMES-SISSAMIS, ET AL.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 148th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N


Before Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Dorsey and Rodriguez

Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, Jessica James, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 95-3550-E. Judgment in this cause was signed on April 20, 2000. A timely motion for new trial was filed on May 19, 2000. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on July 19, 2000, but was not filed until July 21, 2000.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant. Appellant has failed to provide this Court with facts that reasonably show the need to extend the time for filing the notice of appeal. See Industrial Svs., Inc. v. American Bank, N.A., 17 S.W.3d 358, 359 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 2000, no pet.).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 24th day of August, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Industrial Services U.S.A., Inc. v. American Bank, N.A.
17 S.W.3d 358 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of Anastasia Nicole James-Sissamis and Christina Michelle James-Sissamis, Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-anastasia-nicole-james-sissamis-texapp-2000.