in the Interest of A.M.R., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 17, 2020·No. 06-20-00050-CV·Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-20-00050-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.R., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 468th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court No. 468-56100-2016

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER

Pending before this Court is Appellant Melody Su Rivas’s notice of inquiry. In her

notice, Rivas contends that at least two exhibits are missing from the record. According to

Rivas, the record should include an agreed order (Exhibit 1), a paternity test (Exhibit 2), and

temporary orders (Exhibit 3). The only exhibits attached to the originally filed reporter’s record

were two photocopies of photographs. It appears that the paternity test (Exhibit 2) was filed in a

supplemental reporter’s record, but the other two exhibits have not been filed in this Court.

Rivas maintains that she, through counsel, asked the court reporter about the missing exhibits but

did not receive a satisfactory response.

Since Rivas has raised issues regarding the accuracy of the record after it has been filed

in this Court, we will submit this dispute to the trial court for resolution under Rules 34.5(e) and

34.6, subsections (e) and (f), of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.5(e), 34.6(e), (f). We hereby abate this matter to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary

hearing pursuant to Rules 34.5(e) and 34.6, subsections (e) and (f), for the purposes of

(1) determining whether all portions of the record to which the parties are entitled have been

provided to them and filed with this Court and (2) identifying and correcting, if possible, any

inaccuracies or deficiencies in the reporter’s record.

We instruct the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing within fifteen days of the

date of this order and to enter findings regarding the following:

1. Precisely what portions of the record Rivas (or any other party) claims are

missing and/or what parts of the record Rivas (or any other party) claims are inaccurate.

2 2. For each error or omission identified in response to number 1 above, whether the

issue can be resolved by agreement as contemplated by Rules 34.5(e) or 34.6(e)(1) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure.

3. If such error or omission can be corrected by agreement, then the trial court is

instructed to take steps to ensure that the record is corrected in accordance with the parties’

agreement.

4. If such error or omission cannot be corrected by agreement, then the trial court is

instructed to take the steps outlined in Rules 34.5(e) and 34.6(e)(2) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure to resolve the dispute and correct the record.

5. For each error or omission identified in response to number 1 above, whether any

missing exhibit or portion of the record has been lost or destroyed as contemplated by Rules

34.5(e) and 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

6. For each exhibit or portion of the record that is determined to be lost or destroyed,

if any, the trial court is instructed to take evidence on and enter findings regarding each of the

four factors set out in Rule 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and to enter

recommendations regarding whether the appellant is entitled to a new trial as a result of the lost

or destroyed exhibit or portion of the record.

7. We also request that the trial court make any additional findings that it believes

will be helpful to this Court in fully and finally resolving all issues related to the record in this

matter.

3 The trial court’s findings, as set forth above, shall be entered into the record of the case

and filed with this Court as a supplemental clerk’s record within ten days of the date of the

hearing. The reporter’s record of the hearing, and any certified corrections to the reporter’s

record under Rule 34.6(e)(2), shall be filed in the form of a supplemental reporter’s records

within ten days of the date of the hearing.

All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of the supplemental

record. We withdraw the current briefing deadline and will establish a new briefing schedule

once the case is returned to our jurisdiction from abatement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: December 17, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of A.M.R., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

in the Interest of A.M.R., a Child (in the Interest of A.M.R., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.