in the Interest of A.M., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 7, 2017·No. 02-17-00298-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00298-CV NO. 02-17-00300-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M., A CHILD

------------

FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NOS. 323-103401-16, 323-105593-17

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered appellants’ “Verified Joint Motion to Set Aside Trial

Court’s Judgment[s] and Remand Based on Settlement Agreement.” It is the

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, in accordance with

rule 42.1(a)(2)(B), we set aside the trial court’s August 22, 2017 orders without

regard to the merits and remand these cases to the trial court to render

judgments in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.2 See Tex. R.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 Based on our disposition of the parties’ joint motion, the Department of Family and Protective Services’s request to stay its briefing deadline is denied as moot. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387,

388 (Tex. 1995).

Costs of these appeals shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 7, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of A.M., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

in the Interest of A.M., a Child (in the Interest of A.M., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Innovative Office System, Inc. v. Johnson
911 S.W.2d 387 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)