in the Interest of A.L., a Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 15, 2018
Docket02-17-00460-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of A.L., a Child (in the Interest of A.L., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of A.L., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00460-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L., A CHILD

----------

FROM THE 233RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 233-614335-17

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

D.R. (Mother) attempts to appeal from the “Temporary Orders” entered in a

suit affecting the parent-child relationship. On January 2, 2018, we notified the

parties that we were concerned that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal because

the “Temporary Orders” did not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable

interlocutory order. We informed them that we could dismiss the appeal for want

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. of jurisdiction unless Mother or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a

response on or before January 12, 2018, showing grounds for continuing the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. Mother filed a response

acknowledging that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal.

We have jurisdiction to consider appeals only from final judgments or from

interlocutory orders made immediately appealable by statute. See Bally Total

Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Lehman v. Har-Con

Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Temporary orders entered in suits

affecting the parent-child relationship are not appealable interlocutory orders.

See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 105.001(e) (West 2014); Hubert v. Hubert, No. 01-

11-00438-CV, 2012 WL 4739952, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st District] Oct. 4,

2012, no pet.) (mem. op) (noting that section 105.001(e) “expressly precludes an

interlocutory appeal from a temporary order in a suit affecting the parent-child

relationship”); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a) (West

Supp. 2017) (listing types of appealable interlocutory orders). Because the

“Temporary Orders” are neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory

order, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a),

43.2(f); Hubert, 2012 WL 4739952, at *1 (dismissing appeal from temporary

orders for want of jurisdiction).

2 /s/ Elizabeth Kerr ELIZABETH KERR JUSTICE

PANEL: KERR, PITTMAN, and BIRDWELL, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 15, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson
53 S.W.3d 352 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of A.L., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-al-a-child-texapp-2018.