in the Interest of A.K.P., a Child v. .
This text of in the Interest of A.K.P., a Child v. . (in the Interest of A.K.P., a Child v. .) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00305-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.K.P., a Child
From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-PA-01650 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 26, 2020
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
On May 19, 2020, the trial court made notes indicating that it would terminate Appellant’s
rights to her children. On June 8, 2020, Appellant Mom 1 filed a notice of appeal.
The Texas Family Code authorizes appeal of a final order terminating a parent’s rights to
their child in accordance with “the procedures for accelerated appeals in civil cases under the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure.” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(a); accord In re D.M.B., 467
S.W.3d 100, 102 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015, pet. denied).
Generally, “an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. A judgment is final for
purposes of appeal if it disposes of all pending parties and claims in the record, except as necessary
to carry out the decree.” Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). In contrast
1 We use aliases for Appellant and the child. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b). 04-20-00305-CV
to a signed, final judgment, a judge’s notes are for the court’s convenience and are not a final,
appealable order or judgment. In re A.W., 384 S.W.3d 872, 873 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012,
no pet.) (“[A] judge’s notes are for his or her own convenience and form no part of the record.”);
see also In re S.L.M., No. 04-16-00456-CV, 2016 WL 4537664, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
Aug. 31, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“[A] judge’s notes do not constitute an appealable order.”).
On July 16, 2020, we advised Appellant that the record does not contain a signed, final
order, and we ordered Appellant to show cause in writing by July 31, 2020, why this appeal should
not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at
195. We warned Appellant that if she did not timely file written proof as ordered, this appeal
would be dismissed without further notice.
To date, Appellant has not filed any response to our July 16, 2020 order. Because the
appellate record does not contain a final, appealable order, we dismiss this appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of A.K.P., a Child v. ., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-akp-a-child-v-texapp-2020.