In the Interest of A.H.
574 So. 2d 1229, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1446, 1991 WL 22528
Opinion
We affirm as to all points raised by the appellant; however, we remand to the lower court with directions to reconcile the inconsistency between the written restitution order and the oral pronouncement of restitution. A.R. v. State, 475 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Interest of A.H., 574 So. 2d 1229, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1446, 1991 WL 22528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
574 So. 2d 1229 (In the Interest of A.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A.R. v. State
475 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)