in the Interest of A.E.M., a Minor Child

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in the Interest of A.E.M., a Minor Child. Read the opinion of the Court — 455 S.W.3d 684
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 3, 2015·No. 01-14-00123-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BAN RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of A.E.M., a Minor Child

Appellate case number: 01-14-00123-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-29304

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley Acting for the En Banc Court

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.

A majority of the justices of the Court voted to deny the motion for en banc reconsideration.

Justices Keyes, Bland, Brown, and Huddle dissent, without opinion, from the denial of en banc reconsideration.

Date: February 3, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of A.E.M., a Minor Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in the Interest of A.E.M., a Minor Child (in the Interest of A.E.M., a Minor Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.