In the Interest of A.D.J.
586 So. 2d 451, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9686
Opinion
The trial court did not err in denying the motion for recusal, Moser v. Coleman, 460 So.2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), or in finding clear and convincing evidence to support the termination of appellant’s parental rights. In the Interest of D.J.S. and J.S.G., 563 So.2d 655, 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (en banc). Accordingly, the order under review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Interest of A.D.J., 586 So. 2d 451, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
586 So. 2d 451 (In the Interest of A.D.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Interest of DJS
563 So. 2d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Moser v. Coleman
460 So. 2d 385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)