in the Interest of A.C.T.M., a Child
This text of in the Interest of A.C.T.M., a Child (in the Interest of A.C.T.M., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00517-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN THE INTEREST OF A.C.T.M., A CHILD
On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam
This appeal arises from the trial court’s termination of mother M.T.M.’s parental
rights over A.C.T.M., a minor child. 1 The court reporter has previously requested and
received one extension of time to file the reporter’s record causing the reporter’s record
to be due on November 28, 2022. On November 28, 2022, the court reporter filed her
second request for extension of time to file the reporter’s record in this cause. Citing the
1We refer to appellant and the child by their initials in accordance with the rules of appellate procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b)(2). need for additional time to complete the reporter’s record, the court reporter has
requested an extension of time to file the reporter’s record on December 9, 2022.
Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the
rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals but include additional expedited
deadlines and procedures. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). The
intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that
appeals are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is
filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). Because these appeals involve fundamental rights that
necessitate expedited consideration, this Court requires strict adherence to the deadlines
provided by the appellate rules and looks with disfavor upon the delays caused by
requests for extensions of time.
The Court, having fully examined the court reporter’s second request for an
extension of time to file the record, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, it should
be granted by this order. Accordingly, the Court grants the court reporter’s second request
for an extension of time to file the record. The Court orders the court reporter, Akilah
Welborn, to file the reporter’s record in this Court no later than December 9, 2022. No
further requests for extension of time will be entertained by the Court absent exigent
circumstances. The failure of the court reporter to file the record by the date set forth in
this order shall result in the referral of this matter to the Court and may result in the
issuance of an order to show cause.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 1st day of December, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of A.C.T.M., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-actm-a-child-texapp-2022.