In the Interest of A.C.,minor Child
This text of In the Interest of A.C.,minor Child (In the Interest of A.C.,minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 14-0547 Filed March 11, 2015
IN THE INTEREST OF
A.C.,Minor Child, Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Rachael E. Seymour,
District Associate Judge.
A.C. appeals from the order adjudicating him a delinquent. AFFIRMED.
Marshall W. Orsini of Carr & Wright, P.L.C., Des Moines, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Bruce Kempkes, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and Christine Gonzalez, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee State.
Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., Mullins, J., and Scott, S.J.*
*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2015). 2
SCOTT, S.J.
A.C. appeals from the order adjudicating him a delinquent after he was
found to have committed two acts of assault, in violation of Iowa Code section
708.1 (2013), and one act of assault causing bodily injury, in violation of Iowa
Code sections 708.1 and 708.2(2). He contends the juvenile court erred in
finding he assaulted school employees.
I. Background Facts.
On November 11, 2013, seventeen-year-old A.C. arrived at Des Moines
North High School. When Vice Principal Edward McCulley encountered A.C., he
smelled the odor of marijuana and suspected A.C. was under the influence of the
drug. McCulley attempted to search A.C. for marijuana, but A.C. became
belligerent and refused. A.C. attempted to leave the office by pushing past
McCulley, who was blocking his exit, and threatened to punch McCulley in the
face if McCulley did not get out of the way.
Other school employees were alerted to the disruption and attempted to
calm A.C. down. They described his demeanor as belligerent, upset and erratic,
out of control, and enraged. A.C. persisted in trying to leave and, in the process,
pushed the campus monitor and kicked him in the leg. The staff then attempted
to restrain A.C., who continued to resist by kicking and yelling. He succeeded in
kicking the school social worker in the chest and the athletic director in the hip.
A.C. was charged with two counts of simple assault and one count of
assault causing bodily injury. He pled not guilty to all charges, and a delinquency
trial was held. After hearing testimony from A.C. and school employees, and 3
viewing a videotape of the incident, the juvenile court found A.C. committed the
delinquent acts charged and adjudicated him a delinquent.
II. Scope of Review.
Before a child can be adjudicated delinquent, the State must overcome
the presumption of innocence and prove beyond a reasonable doubt the child
engaged in delinquent conduct. In re J.A.L., 694 N.W.2d 748, 751 (Iowa 2005).
We review delinquency proceedings de novo. Id. We give weight to the juvenile
court’s factual findings, especially when considering witness credibility, though
we are not bound by those findings. Id. at 754.
III. Merits.
A.C. first argues there is insufficient evidence he committed the acts of
assault because there is no showing he intended for his contact with school
employees to insult or offend. See Iowa Code § 708.1 (defining assault as an act
that “is intended to place another in fear of immediate physical contact which will
be painful, injurious, insulting, or offensive, coupled with the apparent ability to
execute the act”). The statute requires the accused have the specific intent “‘to
place another in fear of immediate contact which will be painful, injurious,
insulting, or offensive.’” State v. Copenhaver, 844 N.W.2d 442, 452 (Iowa 2014)
(quoting Iowa Code § 708.1(2)). We may infer that intent from the accused’s
actions and the circumstances of the transaction. Id. Here, A.C. intentionally
pushed and kicked school employees after threatening to punch McCulley. The
evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt that A.C. committed the acts of
assault. 4
In the alternative, A.C. argues he was justified in using force. See Iowa
Code § 704.3. (“A person is justified in the use of reasonable force when the
person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to defend oneself or
another from any imminent use of unlawful force.”). A person is not justified in
using force if that person started or continued the incident that resulted in the
injury. See State v. Shanahan, 723 N.W.2d 121, 134 (Iowa 2006). Although
A.C. claims his “physical agitation became elevated” after he was restrained by
school employees, the record shows A.C. initiated the incident by threatening
and assaulting school staff before any attempt was made to restrain him.
Accordingly, A.C. was not justified in using force.
Because the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that A.C.
committed acts intended to insult or offend without justification, we affirm the
order adjudicating him delinquent.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of A.C.,minor Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-acminor-child-iowactapp-2015.