in the Interest of A.C., S.C., and B.W., Children
This text of in the Interest of A.C., S.C., and B.W., Children (in the Interest of A.C., S.C., and B.W., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-17-00060-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.C., S.C., AND B.W., CHILDREN
From the 21st District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court No. 28,210
ABATEMENT ORDER
The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed a Motion to Request
a Copy of the Sealed Records with the Clerk of this Court contending that “this Court
ordered the appellate record in the cause to be sealed to the public” and requesting a copy
of the “records” so that the Department could prepare and file its brief in this appeal.
This Court did not order the appellate record sealed. Rather, the attorney
representing the Department in the proceeding in the trial court requested that the trial
court seal the records. The trial court obliged and issued an order sealing “all
documents” and stating, “[t]he documents shall not be opened or released except on
appropriate court order.” The trial court then made a hand-written addition to the order allowing appellant’s attorney to “open and view all documents.” No similar provision
was provided for the Department.
Because we are not aware of the reason why the Department requested or why the
trial court sealed the record, we are reluctant to modify the trial court’s sealing order.
Accordingly, this proceeding is abated so that the Department may present its motion to
the trial court which granted the Department’s motion to seal the record, thus denying
the Department access to that record, and the trial court is Ordered to hold a hearing on
the Department’s motion within 14 days of the date of this Order. Supplemental
reporter’s and clerk’s records containing the trial court’s written or oral ruling on the
Department’s motion are due 7 days after the date of the hearing.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal abated Order issued and filed April 19, 2017
In the Interest of A.C., S.C., and B.W., Children Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of A.C., S.C., and B.W., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ac-sc-and-bw-children-texapp-2017.