in the Interest of A.A.M, and A.A.M., Children
This text of in the Interest of A.A.M, and A.A.M., Children (in the Interest of A.A.M, and A.A.M., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 18, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01243-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.M, AND A.A.M., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-50617-2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Breedlove We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from the trial court’s August
5, 2022 final decree of divorce and October 18, 2022 “Memorandum and Order on
Petitioner’s Motion to Reconsider” as it appeared to have been untimely filed. See
Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex.
App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g) (timely filing of notice of appeal is
jurisdictional). Under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1(a) and 26.3, the
notice of appeal was due no later than November 3, 2022, or, with an extension
motion, November 18, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a) (providing ninety-day
deadline for filing notice of appeal when motion for new trial or to reconsider is
filed), 26.3 (providing for fifteen-day extension of time to file notice of appeal). The notice of appeal was filed November 17, 2022, within the extension period, but
without an extension motion. See id. 26.3.
In accordance with Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615 (Tex. 1997), we gave
appellant an opportunity to file an extension motion. Although we cautioned
appellant that failure to comply within ten days could result in dismissal of the appeal
without further notice, more than ten days have passed and appellant has not
complied. Accordingly, on the record before us, we dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Brashear, 302 S.W.3d at 545.
/Maricela Breedlove/ MARICELA BREEDLOVE JUSTICE
221243F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.M, On Appeal from the 401st Judicial AND A.A.M., CHILDREN District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-50617- No. 05-22-01243-CV 2020. Opinion delivered by Justice Breedlove, Justices Molberg and Reichek participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee Arunabha Mukherjee recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Antara Mukherjee.
Judgment entered January 18, 2023.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of A.A.M, and A.A.M., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-aam-and-aam-children-texapp-2023.