in the Interest of A.A.E., a Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 28, 2014
Docket07-14-00154-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of A.A.E., a Child (in the Interest of A.A.E., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of A.A.E., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00154-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.E., A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 847782, Honorable Pamela Cook Sirmon, Presiding

April 28, 2014

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant, Jessica, attempts to appeal the order signed on April 15, 2014, by an

associate judge in a family law matter involving conservatorship of and child support for

her son, A.A.E.1 Concluding that we do not have jurisdiction over this matter, we will

dismiss the cause for want of jurisdiction.

We have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from a “final order” rendered under

Title 5 of the Texas Family Code. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(b) (West 2014);

1 To protect the parent’s and child’s privacy, we will refer to the mother by the alias, “Jessica,” and refer to the child by his initials. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (West 2014); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b). Graham v. Graham, 414 S.W.3d 800, 801 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, no

pet.); see also Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (observing

that “the general rule, with a few mostly statutory exceptions, is that an appeal may be

taken only from a final judgment”).

An order of an associate judge presiding over a Title IV-D case may become an

order of the referring court by operation of law without need for ratification by the

referring court. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 201.1041(a) (West 2014). However, the

order automatically becomes final only if a request for a de novo hearing is not filed in

the referring court within three days of the associate judge’s ruling. See id. §§

201.015(a) (West 2014), 201.1041(a); In re the Office of the Att’y Gen. of Tex., 215

S.W.3d 913, 916 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, orig. proceeding).

Here, it has come to the attention to the Clerk of this Court that a request for a de

novo hearing has been timely filed in the County Court at Law No. 2 of Potter County

under trial court cause number 847782, and that case is currently on that court’s active

docket. That being so, the associate judge’s order signed April 15, 2014, is not a final

order from which an appeal may be taken to this Court.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal of an associate judge’s order that is

not final. See Graham, 414 S.W.3d at 802. Accordingly, we dismiss this case for want

of jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Office of the Attorney General of Texas
215 S.W.3d 913 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Ryan Lee Graham v. Kelly Michelle Graham
414 S.W.3d 800 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of A.A.E., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-aae-a-child-texapp-2014.