in the Interest of A. D. A. and S. L. A., Children
Opinion
Kevin Shawn Armstrong filed a pro se notice of appeal November 13, 2008. Because this Court initially determined Armstrong desired to appeal from the final decree of divorce, we allowed the appeal to proceed. Armstrong has now informed this Court that his desire was to appeal from the trial court's temporary order entered the same date as the final decree of divorce. Orders of this type are not subject to interlocutory appeal. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 105.001(e) (Vernon 2008). Therefore, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear this appeal.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Bailey C. Moseley
Justice
Date Submitted: February 12, 2009
Date Decided: February 13, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of A. D. A. and S. L. A., Children (in the Interest of A. D. A. and S. L. A., Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.