in the Guardianship of Shelley Thomson A/ka Shelley Sue Thomson, an Incapacitated Person

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 10, 2020
Docket13-20-00378-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Guardianship of Shelley Thomson A/ka Shelley Sue Thomson, an Incapacitated Person (in the Guardianship of Shelley Thomson A/ka Shelley Sue Thomson, an Incapacitated Person) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Guardianship of Shelley Thomson A/ka Shelley Sue Thomson, an Incapacitated Person, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NUMBERS 13-19-00517-CV, 13-20-00378-CV, 13-20-00379-CV, 13-20-00380-CV & 13-20-00381-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF SHELLEY THOMSON A/K/A SHELLEY SUE THOMSON, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON

On appeal from the County Court at Law of Comal County, Texas.

ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

Appellants Jo Ann Rivera, Shelly Thompson, and Philip Ross, filed notices of

appeal in appellate cause number 13-19-00517-CV from several judgments entered on

May 31, 2019, July 17, 2019, August 19, 2019, and October 31, 2019, by the County

Court of Comal County, Texas, in a guardianship proceeding. Selene Smith joined

appellants’ notice of appeal of the October 31, 2019 order. As a general rule, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. In re

Guardianship of Glasser, 297 S.W.3d 369, 372 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, no pet.)

(citing Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)). However, probate

and guardianship proceedings are often exceptions to the “one final judgment” rule. In re

Guardianship of Benavides, 403 S.W.3d 370, 374 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet.

denied) (citing De Ayala v. Mackie, 193 S.W.3d 575, 578 (Tex. 2006)). “In probate and

guardianship proceedings, ‘multiple judgments final for purposes of appeal can be

rendered on certain discrete issues.’” See id. Thus, we must determine whether each

order challenged in this appeal finally disposed of all issues raised in the trial court which

ended a discrete phase of the guardianship proceedings making the order final for

purposes of appeal and whether the appellants timely filed a notice of appeal for each of

the trial court’s orders. See id. (citing Logan v. McDaniel, 21 S.W.3d 683, 689 (Tex. App.

—Austin 2000, pet. denied)).

Accordingly, the appeal with respect to the May 31, 2019 order is hereby

SEVERED from cause number 13-19-00517-CV and placed into appellate cause number

13-20-00378-CV styled In The Guardianship of Shelley Thompson a/k/a Shelley Sue

Thompson, an Incapacitated Person, the appeal of the July 17, 2019 order is hereby

SEVERED from cause number 13-19-00517-CV and placed into appellate cause number

13-20-00379-CV, styled In The Guardianship of Shelley Thompson a/k/a Shelley Sue

Thompson, an Incapacitated Person. Furthermore, the appeal of the August 19, 2019

order is hereby SEVERED from cause number 13-19-00517-CV and placed into appellate

cause number 13-20-00380-CV, styled In The Guardianship of Shelley Thompson a/k/a

Shelley Sue Thompson, an Incapacitated Person.

2 In addition, Smith is not a party to the October 31, 2019 order; therefore, we hereby

SEVER Smith’s attempted appeal of the October 31, 2019 order in cause number 13-19-

000517-CV and place Smith’s attempted appeal into appellate cause number 13-20-

00381-CV.

The appeal with respect to appellants Jo Ann Rivera, Shelly Thompson, and Philip

Ross of the October 31, 2019 order remains docketed under the original cause number

13-19-00517-CV and will proceed in due course.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 10th day of September, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Ayala v. MacKie
193 S.W.3d 575 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)
Logan v. McDaniel
21 S.W.3d 683 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
In Re the Guardianship of Glasser
297 S.W.3d 369 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
in the Matter of the Guardianship of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr.
403 S.W.3d 370 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Guardianship of Shelley Thomson A/ka Shelley Sue Thomson, an Incapacitated Person, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-guardianship-of-shelley-thomson-aka-shelley-sue-thomson-an-texapp-2020.