in the Estate of Stewart D. Hervey Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 3, 2017
Docket13-17-00285-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Estate of Stewart D. Hervey Jr. (in the Estate of Stewart D. Hervey Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Estate of Stewart D. Hervey Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-17-00285-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

IN THE ESTATE OF STEWART D. HERVEY JR., DECEASED ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rodriguez

Appellant, Karen Kilpatrick, attempted to perfect an appeal from the trial court’s

order imposing sanctions which took place at a hearing conducted on March 9, 2017, in

cause no. 26048. According to the notice of appeal, a motion to sever had been filed,

but the trial court had not signed a written order of severance to make the order final.

Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that there was no final

appealable judgment. On June 7, 2017, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this

defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten

days from the date of receipt of the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. Appellant has not responded to the Court’s notice.

In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review

final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. Lehmann v. Har-

Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because there is no final judgment or order

subject to appeal, the notice of appeal is premature. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 27.1(a)

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for

want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF

JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ Justice

Delivered and filed the 3rd day of August, 2017.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Estate of Stewart D. Hervey Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-estate-of-stewart-d-hervey-jr-texapp-2017.