in the Estate of Stewart D. Hervey Jr.
This text of in the Estate of Stewart D. Hervey Jr. (in the Estate of Stewart D. Hervey Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-17-00285-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
IN THE ESTATE OF STEWART D. HERVEY JR., DECEASED ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rodriguez
Appellant, Karen Kilpatrick, attempted to perfect an appeal from the trial court’s
order imposing sanctions which took place at a hearing conducted on March 9, 2017, in
cause no. 26048. According to the notice of appeal, a motion to sever had been filed,
but the trial court had not signed a written order of severance to make the order final.
Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that there was no final
appealable judgment. On June 7, 2017, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this
defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten
days from the date of receipt of the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction. Appellant has not responded to the Court’s notice.
In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review
final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. Lehmann v. Har-
Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because there is no final judgment or order
subject to appeal, the notice of appeal is premature. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 27.1(a)
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to
correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for
want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ Justice
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of August, 2017.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Estate of Stewart D. Hervey Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-estate-of-stewart-d-hervey-jr-texapp-2017.