in the Estate of Ned Theodore Gordon

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Estate of Ned Theodore Gordon

DecidedJuly 12, 2012

Docket14-12-00511-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Estate of Ned Theodore Gordon (in the Estate of Ned Theodore Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Estate of Ned Theodore Gordon, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed July 12, 2012

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-12-00511-CV ____________

IN THE ESTATE OF NED THEODORE GORDON, DECEASED

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #4 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-CPR-022104

ABATEMENT ORDER

On May 21, 2012, appellant, Marshall Gordon, filed a notice of appeal from a portion of a judgment signed August 8, 2011, which was purportedly made final and appealable by a final summary judgment signed April 20, 2012. The record has not yet been filed.

On June 19, 2012, appellant filed an opposed motion to abate this appeal pending resolution of his motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction a related appeal docketed under our case number 14-11-00812-CV, and styled Patricia Vickery v. Marshall Gordon & Clardy, Davis & Knowles,. On July 3, 2012, appellee in this case, Patricia Vickery, filed a response in opposition to the motion. Appellee asserts that jurisdiction has not been properly invoked over this appeal, and she will file a motion to dismiss the appeal after the record has been filed. Appellant contends, however, that the ruling on the pending motion to dismiss in the related appeal may determine whether this appeal will continue. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion and issue the following order:

This appeal is ordered ABATED until appellant’s motion to dismiss filed in case number 14-11-00812-CV has been decided, or until further order of this court. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court=s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court=s active docket when the jurisdictional motion filed in case number 14-11-00812-CV has been decided. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed July 12, 2012

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-12-00511-CV ____________

IN THE ESTATE OF NED THEODORE GORDON, DECEASED

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #4 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-CPR-022104

ABATEMENT ORDER

On May 21, 2012, appellant, Marshall Gordon, filed a notice of appeal from a portion of a judgment signed August 8, 2011, which was purportedly made final and appealable by a final summary judgment signed April 20, 2012. The record has not yet been filed.

On June 19, 2012, appellant filed an opposed motion to abate this appeal pending resolution of his motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction a related appeal docketed under our case number 14-11-00812-CV, and styled Patricia Vickery v. Marshall Gordon & Clardy, Davis & Knowles,. On July 3, 2012, appellee in this case, Patricia Vickery, filed a response in opposition to the motion. Appellee asserts that jurisdiction has not been properly invoked over this appeal, and she will file a motion to dismiss the appeal after the record has been filed. Appellant contends, however, that the ruling on the pending motion to dismiss in the related appeal may determine whether this appeal will continue. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion and issue the following order:

This appeal is ordered ABATED until appellant’s motion to dismiss filed in case number 14-11-00812-CV has been decided, or until further order of this court. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court=s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court=s active docket when the jurisdictional motion filed in case number 14-11-00812-CV has been decided. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Estate of Ned Theodore Gordon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-estate-of-ned-theodore-gordon-texapp-2012.